Written Task 2 Introduction


  1. How could the text be read and interpreted differently by two different readers?



Texts may be interpreted differently amongst variant audiences and this can be seen within the opinion column by Niranjana Jayakrishnan, entitled “I am a Woman, from Kerala. Here’s Why I am Against the Sabarimala Verdict”. Firstly, she instills her credibility as a woman by using ethos, regarding the ongoing issue of the Sabarimala Verdict from the High Court that declared the entrance of all females into the holy temple. She introduces her standpoint from the beginning itself through the use of bias by headline. By doing so, she promotes attention towards her column from the majority of the public who’s against the verdict. Her perspective, similar to the mass amount, is based upon religious ideology and the belief that women shouldn’t be allowed from ages 10 up until 50 because of physiological restraints.

2. Which social groups are marginalized, excluded or silenced within the text?





The editorial from the Guardian entitled “The Guardian view on toilet breaks: stop all the clocks”, only speaks on behalf of members of faculty in companies and corporations who are strict upon the working time and break times that their staff receives. But on the other hand, the employers and companies are solely blamed for their asserted strictness regarding break times, while they aren’t even presented with a chance to justify their reasoning or perspective of doing so. While they are accused by the bias through the use of names and titles (name-calling) with stripping employees off their “toilet dignity” and uplifting a sanitation crisis in their lives, the editorial has excluded this set of members who are being accused and therefore, uses a bias of source control.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Births Outside of Marriage

'I Have a Dream' ~Martin Luther King, Kr.

Opinion Column