Twtr? It's majorly bad!
We
express our thoughts through speaking the language in a way that others are
able to understand your message. As long as they understand, does it really
matter the way you say it? “Twtr? It’s majorly bad! Leading head teacher
condemns ‘text speak’ for eroding schoolchildren’s language skills”, published
by Laura Clark for the Daily Mail, literally communicates the effect of text
speech in student’s academic performances, especially in the English language.
The authoritarian states that the constant use of the ‘fingered speech’ limits
the child’s vocabulary, accurate spelling ability and even frequent grammatical
mistakes. If the words were to be complex or simple, the spelling spelt
completely or as an abbreviation, the grammar correct or incorrect, would the
meaning of it still change? Because I don’t think so. Professionally, you might
say that the changes made to their core foundation may lead these
schoolchildren to be affected in the future, perhaps while looking for jobs.
This would be true in the case of this generation, while interviewers, still
hunt for potential graduates with an exceptionally persuasive communication
skills. But do they really go through the process of a written interview, or a
verbal one? Soon, in the years to come, this cliché way of thinking and judging
a person’s capability based on their spelling bee tests, would be in the trash.
Replaced with a new techie generation of the current youngsters, casual talk
could be the future requirement that a job interviewer would seek. The world
changes, and so should we by adapting to the changes made and accepting them in
a positive way. So Ms. Clark, try to understand the linguistic changes
happening in the world and be more open to new ways. Nowadays, it’s all about being
able to communicate in a way people are able to understand the content, not if
it’s academically correct or incorrect.
Amoolya Shishupalan
Abu Dhabi
Abu Dhabi
Comments
Post a Comment